The Problem with Internet Only Campaigns or Draft Movements

The Deacon wonders what happened to make people think that they could run a campaign or draft movement solely online. Did the internet become free for everyone, did everyone get a computer, are you foolish enough to think that everyone has a computer and uses it to actively search for your web site? There's no doubt that blogs have become more popular, but they are still not a valid news source, and very few people over the age of 30 are going to search through blogs to find one they like rather than go directly to one they've been told about - and that's where the problem lies.

Sure, you can build up numbers through word of mouth and emails to friends, but what about everyone outside of your circle? "Well, set up a Meetup in your area and start a group." No, for 2 reasons. 1 - it costs money for someone who might not be totally interested in your group to start a Meetup. 2 - these people don't know enough about your group and want to know more, is there downloadable materials for them to distribute to inform the general public?

The Draft Clark movement worked in 2004 because there was an internet and a ground presence - you could actually go out somewhere and find people handing out information about the movement and the candidate. There was a Draft Hagel movement this year, but people obviously thought it could grow on its own without them stepping up and out. There was the great failure that is Unity08, where tech geeks thought they could revolutionize the system without informing people about what they were doing or how. Now, there is the Draft Bloomberg movement. Go to www.draftbloomberg.com, and there will not be anything for you to download to hand out to people. Go to www.uniteformike.com, and there is at least a downloadable flier, but there's also a "Collect Signatures" option that shows you links to other sites rather than a form to download and take with you to actually do what you thought you clicked on - collect signatures.

People, if you want these candidate to run or win, you are not doing a very good job of showing them proper support to get it done. If you have nothing to show people, a physical piece of paper at the very least, then you have nothing at all. A name and an email address is not going to go door-to-door for you, only people will. Step out from behind your computers, and interact with your fellow Americans, or stop wasting our time!

What the 2008 Election CANNOT Be About

The Deacon was a fan of Mitt Romney in 1994 and 2002, but has not cared for Willard in a long while. Just listening to him suspend his campaign, the Deacon heard something that cast a shadow over his day. Suspending his campaign so that a national campaign could start early and defeat Hilary or Barak and prevent our country surrendering to terrorists, that was pathetic. The election of 2008 CANNOT be about terror! If we allow the campaigns and parties to take us down that road heading into November, we will never talk about the issues that really matter - health care, the economy, the environment, eduction, the things we deal with in our every day lives. Seriously, how often in your day does a terrorist threat occur? As often as someone you know becomes ill, a few houses in your town are foreclosed?

People, we cannot allow the election to be about terror. The point of terror is to disrupt the norm. Neglecting the issues that actually matter to us, we will be losing the war on terror by supposedly fighting it. We cannot follow the lead set by the Bush Administration and the Republican herd in Congress. Move on or fall behind - that needs to be the motto of the nation for 2008 - move on or fall behind.

Two Down

Well, Giuliani and Edwards have called it quits. Giuliani has thrown his support behind McCain, while Edwards has yet to endorse anyone. They say most of Edwards' supporters will go to Clinton. It seems McCain's plan is to continue to pull in the Independent voters for the primaries. But what about the general election? This Independent is hoping Michael Bloomberg sees this opportunity and takes it! The economy is now stated to be the number 1 issue for voters--even over Iraq. This plays well with Bloomberg and his business/management experience. I hope Bloomberg jumps in there and more Independents see him as a viable alternative to the two-party same-old, same-old.

J.F.

"I wondered who I was running against."

Well, you are supposed to have the experience to be President, and you are running for that office. If you are confused about who you're running against, Hillary or Bill, should we want you as President? Why does it matter who you are addressing? If you can not handle an argument against more than 1 person, why are you running?

Barak Obama should not be President of this country in 2008. We, the people, cannot afford it. If you need pity to win, Mr. Junior Senator, than that is not a quality we want in our leader.